Industries · Pulp & paper
Pulp & paper: ESPs for recovery boilers, power boilers and lime kilns
A kraft recovery boiler ESP collects sub-micron sodium sulphate saltcake fume — sticky, hygroscopic, and returned to the liquor cycle as recovered chemical, not waste. That duty needs SCA of 100–150 s/m against 60–80 s/m for a mill power boiler on bark. Pulp mills run both, plus lime kilns, and each collector has its own basis.
01 — The duty
Why the recovery boiler ESP is unlike any other precipitator in the mill
The dust is a process chemical, the particles are sub-micron, and the boiler cannot run without its collector.
A kraft recovery boiler burns concentrated black liquor to recover pulping chemicals and steam, and in doing so generates a dust found nowhere else in solid-fuel firing: saltcake fume. Sodium compounds vaporise in the char bed, then condense in the upper furnace into particles with a mass mode around 0.5–1 µm — an order of magnitude finer than boiler fly ash — at loads of roughly 10–30 g/Nm³, dominated by Na₂SO₄ with sodium carbonate and chloride. The electrostatic precipitator that collects it is not disposing of a waste: its catch is returned to the liquor cycle as make-up chemical, which makes the recovery boiler ESP a unit operation in the mill's chemistry as much as its emission control.
The same mill typically runs two or three other collection duties — a bark- or hog-fuel power boiler whose fly ash behaves like the general biomass case, and a lime kiln closing the calcium loop. Each has its own gas, dust and sizing basis, worked through below. This page belongs to Arrow's industries series; the quantitative headline for pulp and paper is a single ratio: recovery fume needs a specific collecting area of 100–150 s/m where 60–80 s/m suffices on the power boiler next door — roughly twice the precipitator per unit of gas, for reasons that are pure particle physics.
02 — Ash & gas
Saltcake fume against boiler fly ash: the property gap
Sub-micron, sticky, hygroscopic — every adjective costs collecting area or design care.
| Property | Recovery boiler (kraft) | Power boiler (bark/hog fuel) | Lime kiln |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dust load at collector | ≈ 10–30 g/Nm³ | ≈ 2–8 g/Nm³ | ≈ 5–15 g/Nm³ |
| Dominant particle size | 0.5–1 µm fume | Bimodal, d₅₀ ≈ 10–30 µm | Fine lime/carbonate dust |
| Composition | Na₂SO₄, Na₂CO₃, NaCl | Char + mineral ash, 30–60 % LOI common | CaCO₃/CaO, sodium salts |
| Handling character | Sticky, hygroscopic, cohesive | Free-flowing, abrasive, ember-bearing | Hygroscopic; cementitious if wetted |
| Resistivity behaviour | Moderate — wet, salt-laden gas conducts | ≈ 10⁸–10¹¹ Ω·cm, fuel-dependent | Temperature-sensitive; conditioning helps |
| Gas moisture | High — ≈ 20–30 % by volume | 15–25 % by volume | High — kiln drying load |
| Indicative SCA for duty | 100–150 s/m | 60–80 s/m | Per gas analysis |
| Dust disposition | Returned to liquor cycle | Disposal / soil amendment | Returned to lime circuit |
Why does sub-micron fume demand double the collecting area?
ESP migration velocity passes through a minimum around 0.3–1 µm: particles there are too small to hold much saturation charge, which grows with diameter squared, yet too large for diffusion charging to compensate. Since required collecting area scales inversely with migration velocity, saltcake fume at 0.5–1 µm needs SCA of 100–150 s/m where 10–30 µm bark ash needs 60–80 s/m.
Stickiness adds the second design layer. Hygroscopic sodium salts cake on electrodes and bridge in hoppers if any surface falls near the dewpoint, so recovery ESP casings carry heavier insulation, hopper and casing-floor heating, and rapping systems tuned to shear a cohesive layer without rebounding fume back into the gas. The reward for getting it right is stated above: the catch is revenue, not landfill.
03 — The train
Recommended trains across the mill
High-SCA ESP on recovery; staged collection on the power boiler; duty-specific choice on the lime kiln.
On the recovery boiler the ESP is effectively without competition, and the train is the precipitator itself, sized generously. Fabric filtration is disqualified by the sticky, hygroscopic cake — blinded media, not cleaned media, is the realistic outcome — and wet scrubbing would put the recovered chemical into a water stream the liquor cycle then has to evaporate again. Arrow's recovery basis is a multi-field ESP at 100–150 s/m with sectionalised T/R supplies so a field fault de-rates rather than trips the unit, casing and hopper heating against condensation, and the bottom arrangement chosen with the mill: wet-bottom, sluicing saltcake directly into liquor, or the now more common dry-bottom with drag-chain conveyors delivering dry saltcake to the mix tank. The n-plus-margin logic matters doubly here because a recovery boiler outage stops the entire fibre line.
Chloride and potassium enrichment adds a control dimension the power boiler never sees. NaCl and KCl are the most volatile components of the fume, so they concentrate in the finest particles — and because the ESP catch is recycled to the liquor, chloride recirculates and builds up in the cycle unless a purge exists. Many mills therefore treat part of the precipitator catch, or dust from the last field where enrichment is highest, as the chloride purge point. That process decision reaches back into ESP design: field-by-field dust segregation, separate conveying from the outlet field, and hopper arrangements that let the mill choose per campaign what is recycled and what is purged.
The bark-fired power boiler is the general biomass duty wearing mill colours — char carryover, embers, moderate resistivity — and takes the staged train described on the biomass power page: an Electrocyclone first stage removing the coarse char fraction (and quenching embers), then a compact ESP, or a bag filter where limits are in single digits and pre-collection has removed the fire risk. The lime kiln, whose fine calcium-carbonate dust returns to the lime circuit, is collected in either an ESP or a bag filter downstream of gas cooling; the hygroscopic, potentially cementitious dust pushes the same condensation-avoidance disciplines as the recovery unit.
04 — Non-wood pulping
Soda-process recovery on bagasse and straw pulp
The same fume problem in non-wood mills — familiar territory for Arrow's LATAM work.
Do bagasse and straw pulp mills have the same recovery-boiler dust problem?
Yes. Soda-process recovery boilers in non-wood pulping fire a sodium-based liquor and generate the same sub-micron sodium-salt fume, so the high-SCA ESP basis — 100–150 s/m, heated dry-bottom or wet-bottom casing, catch returned to the liquor cycle — carries over directly. The complication non-wood adds is silica, which bagasse and straw carry into the liquor and partly into the fume.
Silica in the liquor cycle raises viscosity, scales evaporators and dilutes the recovered chemical, and mills manage it in the chemical plant; at the precipitator its effect is a fume whose composition and cohesion differ measurably from clean kraft saltcake. The engineering response is not a different machine but a different starting point: fume analysis from the actual liquor, dust resistivity and cohesion measured rather than assumed, and sizing set from those measurements. Arrow's sugar-sector work in Latin America — where bagasse leaves the mill either for the boiler or for the pulp line — makes this a recurring duty, described generically here; the sugar & bagasse page covers the combustion side of the same fibre.
05 — Basis & references
Sizing basis, limits and references
What is stated generically here, and what is stated per project.
The figures on this page — 0.5–1 µm fume, 10–30 g/Nm³ loads, SCA 100–150 s/m recovery versus 60–80 s/m power boiler — are indicative duty envelopes, not guarantees. Recovery ESP sizing in particular is driven by measured fume properties and by the mill's short-term averaging rules, since liquor firing rate and char-bed condition swing fume load on time scales of minutes. Applicable particulate limits for recovery boilers, power boilers and lime kilns vary by jurisdiction and permit vintage: CONFIRM: current particulate limits for recovery boiler, power boiler and lime kiln stacks in the target jurisdiction, with reference conditions.
Arrow supplies new precipitators, and rebuilds and upgrades existing recovery and power-boiler ESPs — internals, T/R sets, controls and casing-heating systems — within the annual mill shutdown window. Anonymised project summaries on comparable duties are collected under references. Guaranteed figures are stated per project after the technical assessment, on a stated basis: mg/Nm³, reference O₂, dry or wet, and liquor or fuel firing range.
FAQ
Engineering questions, answered
Why does a recovery boiler ESP need so much collecting area?
Because the dust is sub-micron fume, around 0.5–1 µm, condensed from sodium vapour in the furnace. Migration velocity in an ESP falls sharply in that size range, so reaching high efficiency on saltcake takes a specific collecting area of 100–150 s/m — roughly double the 60–80 s/m that suffices for a bark-fired mill power boiler.
What is saltcake and why is it recovered rather than dumped?
Saltcake is the Na₂SO₄-dominated dust carried over from black liquor combustion — typically 10–30 g/Nm³ at the ESP. Sodium and sulphur are the pulping chemicals themselves, so the ESP catch is returned to the mix tank and dissolved back into strong black liquor. The precipitator is part of the mill's chemical recovery loop, not just its emission control.
Wet-bottom or dry-bottom recovery boiler ESP?
Wet-bottom casings sluice the hygroscopic saltcake into a liquor-filled trough, eliminating hopper bridging but adding corrosion and water-balance considerations. Dry-bottom designs use drag-chain conveyors across a flat casing floor with heated, well-insulated boundaries. Modern practice favours dry-bottom with drag conveyors; the choice is set by mill water balance and existing liquor-cycle design.
Can bagasse or straw pulping recovery boilers use the same ESP approach?
Yes — soda-process recovery units in non-wood pulping produce a comparable sodium-salt fume and the same sub-micron collection problem, so the high-SCA ESP basis carries over. Silica carried with bagasse and straw liquor complicates the chemical cycle and changes dust properties, so fume analysis from the actual liquor is the starting point of sizing.
What emission level can a recovery boiler ESP achieve?
Adequately sized modern recovery ESPs are designed to outlet levels of 30–50 mg/Nm³ and below, with lower figures achievable at higher SCA; from inlet loads of 10–30 g/Nm³ that is above 99.5 % collection. Guaranteed figures are stated per project after fume analysis, on a stated basis of mg/Nm³, reference O₂, dry or wet, and liquor firing range.
Send us your plant data
Fuel, boiler capacity, gas flow, current emission and the limit you must meet. An Arrow engineer replies with a technical assessment basis — not a brochure.